Hi,
I just ran into a headscratchy issue that turned out to be based around the UUID. I now wonder if I managed to create an edge case or if there is something missing in regard of the uniqueness of, well, UUIDs.
I just built a site that I developped locally by starting with the filesystem and then as I progressed, enabled the panel for content and editor-friendly things, BUT I also kept working in the filesystem.
In doing so, I somehow duplicated an existing page via the filesystem and later modified that content- and template-wise.
Very much later, indeed after the launch of the site, I now had the (to me) strange effect, that a change in a pages field didnāt get saved. As from my intro you now might expect, that had nothing to do with ākirby isnāt saving my changesā in the live site, as I first suspected, but (quite after a while of looking in several places and debugging) I mananged to change between two pages in the pages field select that both had the same UUID. dang.
Now Iāam all for taking the blame, but I wonder if thereās a way that Kirby could have warned/detected the multiple UUIDs?
cheers!
Tom
PS: And, since weāre in a UUID topic, is there any progress/outlook to UUIDs for structured fields?